Originally posted by Waddles
View Post
Just to clarify this isn't my fix, I only heard about the problem. I agree that limiting the teeter on the rotorhead is a better idea, so long as you aren't swapping blades often and you don't sell it to some not knowing that the rotorhead has been altered.
I believe, not confirmed, this was a batch CNC issue, discovered after arriving in Oz.
Although the plate isn't ideal, it's better than in some cases having to shim under the teeter block of the Hub bar to get the blades to fly in the same plane leaving an uneven surface under the block.
So long as the plate isn't smoking (movement) and it's correctly tensioned I can't see the problem. But that's my opinion. As always it's upto the manufacturer to make that call as to if it's okay or if they exchange it for a new one...


.Rosco 3 D the head at least 3 times checking it but head was perfect of course. If head was problem why was second set perfect. The sad part was that i sent that hub back when rob did the 2nd bar & lost the 1st bar & nothing was the same ever again. Should have flown that 1st bar until it cracked. Quite possibly would have still been flying on that bar. Heard one bloke had done 3000 hours without changing the bar &there are some other makes with big hours out there too.Makes me wonder about what blokes do to their rotors to crack hub bars although after seeing how some fly i wonder how the gyro foesnt break in half. 
Comment